Thread
Index
3 x 32 quicktime recordings (was "Rice and Lefse" progression questions)
Jim Healy
Feb. 11, 2005, 12:57 p.m. (Message 40610)
Greetings! Sophie Rickebusch writes: >I use the recording for "The Misses Cramb of Linlithgow" >from the Book 40 & Children's book CD, which >for some reason is 3x32, although the dance itself is a >conventional 3C in a 4C-set one. My version of the Misses Cramb is for three couples in a three couple set with the more conventional progression of 2,3,1. Is there another version I should know about? Jim Healy Perth, Scotland
Sorry, obviously my mistake... well, perhaps not only mine: I wrote that after having looked up the Misses Cramb in the dance database (online version), which says it's a 3C dance in a 4C longwise set. Plus the other recording mentioned in the database, by Muriel Johnstone, is listed as 8x32. Does anyone have an explanation why that would be? Sophie Quoting Jim Healy <xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx>: > Greetings! > > Sophie Rickebusch writes: > >I use the recording for "The Misses Cramb of Linlithgow" > >from the Book 40 & Children's book CD, which > >for some reason is 3x32, although the dance itself is a > >conventional 3C in a 4C-set one. > My version of the Misses Cramb is for three couples in a three couple set > with the more conventional progression of 2,3,1. Is there another version I > should know about? > > Jim Healy > Perth, Scotland > > > _______________________________________________ > http://strathspey.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/strathspey > -- Sophie Rickebusch CH - Wettswil a. A.
On 11/02/2005 13:07, Sophie Rickebusch wrote: > Sorry, obviously my mistake... well, perhaps not only mine: I wrote that after > having looked up the Misses Cramb in the dance database (online version), which > says it's a 3C dance in a 4C longwise set. Plus the other recording mentioned in > the database, by Muriel Johnstone, is listed as 8x32. Does anyone have an > explanation why that would be? Duh! Because I made a mistake perhaps? OK. I just posted a message inplying how wonderful DanceData is - just deserts indeed. (Or is that desserts - it's lunchtime here?) I WILL check on this. But I myself don't have the Muriel Johnstone recording. Can anyone help me out? Alan
Quoting Alan Paterson <xxxx.xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xx>: > Duh! Because I made a mistake perhaps? > > OK. I just posted a message inplying how wonderful DanceData is - just > deserts indeed. (Or is that desserts - it's lunchtime here?) > > I WILL check on this. But I myself don't have the Muriel Johnstone > recording. Can anyone help me out? Sorry Alan, I didn't mean to criticise... I was really wondering why it would be recorded as 8x32 if it's a 3C in 3C-set dance. If I remember correctly, according to one e-mail that was posted this week-end (but which I don't have at hand as it's on my home computer), the Muriel Johnstone recording is 8x32 (hope I got it right this time!) Despite the inevitable occasional bugs, DanceData is a wonderful tool and a real life-saver... without it I'd probably have to give up my PhD to find the time to prepare my weekly dancing lesson ;-) Cheers, Sophie -- Sophie Rickebusch CH - Wettswil a. A.