June 3, 2008, 12:02 a.m. (Message 52616, in reply to message 52611)
Fiona Grant wrote: > Banning the purchase and use of these swords is to my > mind completely ridiculous, as I know of no occasion when such swords have > been used in violent crime. This misses the point somewhat, I think. The point is not »doing something about the vast numbers of murders etc. being committed using highland dancers' (dull) swords«. The point, on the politicians' part, »is being perceived to do something dramatic for the public good«, even if the public good doesn't really care one way or the other. Fortunately (from the point of view of the proposing party), nobody can really be against the new law in principle as that would be tantamount to condoning »sword crime«. Any objections on the part of the parliamentary opposition would have to be on the grounds of the bill not being far-reaching enough (it should, for example, also ban kitchen knives -- another ingredient to violent crime if there ever was one) or various technicalities of no real consequence (like whether dancing counts as a sport where swords should still be allowed, or not). Anyway, never mind swords for the moment, but is HM Government really planning to outlaw sticks? Any sticks at all? Exactly what must a stick look like and/or be made of to perhaps still be permissible? What about canes or crutches? Broom handles? Tent poles? Fence posts? Railway ties? Toothpicks? Cheese straws? Anselm -- Anselm Lingnau, Friedberg, Germany ..................... xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx Stop trying to protect me from myself. [...] Plastic knives are for picnics. Surgery and the like require scalpels. -- Eric Herrmann