Dec. 4, 2006, 2:38 p.m. (Message 47275, in reply to message 47273)
Sophie Rickebusch wrote: > Is it some cunning ploy to confuse those who are not "in the know" > (keep the riff-raff out, as Basil Fawlty would say)? Or is it just random > inconsistency? Think of it as »equal opportunities«. If symbols such as »cast off behind own lines and back« are obviously drawn from the men's point of view, then some symbols need to be drawn from the ladies' point of view just to be fair (and fill the quota). Hence, leading and casting. In that respect F. L. Pilling was *way* ahead of his time :^) I'm still hoping for the software that will convert dance descriptions into Pilling diagrams automatically. Once we have this, it will be an easy tweak to generate pink Pilling-style books for the ladies and light-blue ones for the men, so all diagrams can be correct-side-up. We can even make (a black?) one for teachers like Martin who prefer to view everything from the top of the set. Anselm -- Anselm Lingnau, Frankfurt, Germany ..................... xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx It's really scary how many major business decisions which affect your job, your investments, or your market, are taken daily on the basis of half-truths and ill-informed opinion simply because no-one thought to check the facts. -- Peter Flynn