June 2, 2008, 7:36 p.m. (Message 52601)
Le 2 juin 08 à 17:28, James Mungall a écrit : > I'll second Wendy's suggestion of Flight of the Falcon. For a public performance? I'd say that reels of three are among the least readable/ understandable figures for the layman. And while a falcon reel well executed can be very elegant, I imagine that it must be even less clear for the average spectator. Straight lines, circles, triangles are easy on the eye. Promenades, poussettes & allemandes should be worth watching. Turns (RH/LH or 2H) are fine. Reels, however, especially when not symmetrical, are a different matter. Just think how long it takes a beginner dancer to undersand the logic of a reel, in spite of regular practicing. The spectator sees a reel once or twice and wonders what on earth we are doing. Although it is not our main purpose in life, our club was asked to put on a little show the other day. We did Shifting Bobbins and Postie's Jig, for their symmetry; Wind on Loch, since the timing of the interlocked reels allows an in&out movement for the whole set, easier to understand than an ordinart reel; Piper & Penguin, for a different formation, with understandable patterns; Johnnie Walker, likewise, plus the change of tempo to wake up the audience; St Martin's Cross, for straight lines symmetry and movement. Midnight Toil, a 5-cp set (but works as a 3-cp), with the two active couples echoing each other (covering) . Sorry, these are not what Monica originally asked for, but I think it is wise to consider which dances are worth watching and why. I did not mention the real reason for choosing the above. Our dancers know them well enough to be relaxed and look as if they are enjoying the activity. The non-specialist spectator does not care a damn whether our feet are pointing correctly or whether our hands are the correct height from the floor. But he can see whether we are enjoying ourselves or not, and that is what counts. Martin