Thread
Index
test message
Patricia Ruggiero
March 20, 2013, 5:22 a.m. (Message 63899)
I've not had any messages from Strathspey since my exchange on 3/14 with Jay Andrews about the Northern Virginia basic tea dance. I thought maybe the list was just quiet; but then I sent three posts last night, and again this morning, about an 1826 dance book, and they haven't appeared in my Inbox either. Did anyone get my posts about that 1826 book? Is anyone getting THIS post? Am I lost in the ether again? Pat Charlottesville, Virginia USA
All your messages have come through here, Pat. Rosemary Coupe From: Patricia Ruggiero Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 8:21 PM To: Scottish Dance Subject: test message I've not had any messages from Strathspey since my exchange on 3/14 with Jay Andrews about the Northern Virginia basic tea dance. I thought maybe the list was just quiet; but then I sent three posts last night, and again this morning, about an 1826 dance book, and they haven't appeared in my Inbox either. Did anyone get my posts about that 1826 book? Is anyone getting THIS post? Am I lost in the ether again? Pat Charlottesville, Virginia USA
Thanks to Rosemary and all who replied both online and privately. This morning I received many messages (all? Some? How would I know?) via Strathspey BUT -- only three of the six I sent about the 1826 book (there were 3 different messages, sent twice), and NOT three different ones. Weird. Well, I hope you all got three different ones: about the book, the index of dances, and the videos. I SEEM to be back on Strathspey, but..... Pat Charlottesville, Virginia (last time I checked)
and they're here in Brisbane, Australia, too. On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:47 AM, Patricia Ruggiero <xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>wrote: > Thanks to Rosemary and all who replied both online and privately. This > morning I received many messages (all? Some? How would I know?) via > Strathspey BUT -- only three of the six I sent about the 1826 book (there > were 3 different messages, sent twice), and NOT three different ones. > Weird. > Well, I hope you all got three different ones: about the book, the index of > dances, and the videos. > > I SEEM to be back on Strathspey, but..... > > Pat > Charlottesville, Virginia (last time I checked) > > > > All your messages have come through here, Pat. > > Rosemary Coupe > > > > > -- Denise Smith 76 Celandine St Shailer Park Qld 4128 +617 3209 7006 xxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx
Patricia Ruggiero wrote: > Did anyone get my posts about that 1826 book? Is anyone getting THIS post? A good way of checking if your posts have made it to distribution is to look at the Strathspey Archive. Generally, anything that is in the Archive has also gone out to the subscribers. PSA: The #1 reason why posts are NOT distributed to subscribers is that they have been sent from an address that cannot be found in the current subscriber database. This happens if people change e-mail addresses in a way that arranges for stuff that is sent to their old address to be forwarded to their new address – if you're »lurking« on the list and don't post that often you may not notice the difference until much later, at which point you may have mostly forgotten about the address change. The remedy is to unsubscribe from the old address (if possible) and to resubscribe from the new one. Anselm -- Anselm Lingnau, Mainz/Mayence, Germany ................. xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx The criteria for being popular on twitter are rather different than the criteria for being a competent statesman; if twitter mattered in that way, Ashton Kucher would be president. -- PZ Myers, observing that Newt Gingrich has 1,325,842 Twitter »followers«
