Thread Index

Who Got Off Track On This One?

0AM7L@SIA

0AM7L@SIA

Jan. 29, 2006, 4:32 p.m. (Message 43930)

I don't know who (mistakenly) got the idea that I suggest workshops be
exclusively for 'walking thru ball dances," but that was clearly not my
original message.  (And who even brought up walk-thrus?  No one goes to a
workshop solely to do walk-thrus.  That's just silly.)

A workshop should teach us how to dance BETTER.

My point was:  rather than the workshop teacher springing a new dance on
us--which we won't do that night, and possibly never--it would be just as
easy for them to perfect our footwork, phrasing, handing and formations
using dances to be done _that night_.

If only one workshop leader takes this to heart and saves us from trying to
absorb a dance we don't 'need to know' that day, and helps us correct our
technique using dances from the evening's program, great!  I hope that he or
she teaches a workshop I attend.

I reiterate that we are not all locals who've learned by heart the 16-18
dances on the program.  And the better we execute them, the better for
everyone.

Margaret Sarna
Iain Boyd

Iain Boyd

Jan. 29, 2006, 9:16 p.m. (Message 43938, in reply to message 43930)

Dear Margaret,
   
  I appreciate what you are saying, but, as an experienced dancer, I
  do not want to dance the dances from the evening programme if I have
  enrolled for an advanced or advanced technique class.
   
  Along with being shown how to dance better I would like to be
  extended with dances which, preferably,  I have not done before.
  Taking into account the number of years I have been dancing this is
  not always possible.
   
  Ideally, I would like also my dancing to be critiqued personally.
  Although I have been an 'advanced' dancer for most of my dancing
  life I am aware that I have some bad habits.
   
  Unfortunately, the number of dancers in a class means that being
  critiqued personally is not always possible.
   
  The concern with dancing the dances from the evening programme
  suggests that the programme may be biased too much towards the
  preferences of local dancers (who may not necessarily be attending
  the classes).
   
  If the school/workshop includes classes for beginner and
  intermediate level dancers then the first half of the evening should
  include few difficult dances.
   
  In my experience, beginner and intermediate level dancers are quite
  happy to dance only the first half of an evening if they have been
  to classes during the day.
   
  The first half of the programme should include simplier dances with
  a scattering of more difficult dances for the more experienced
  dancers while most of the dances in the second half of the programme
  could include mostly dances for the more experienced dancers.
   
  This way, everyone has been catered for.
   
  Regards,
   
  Iain Boyd
  Wellington
  New Zealand
   
   
  

Don & Margaret Sarna <xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
  I don't know who (mistakenly) got the idea that I suggest workshops be
exclusively for 'walking thru ball dances," but that was clearly not my
original message. (And who even brought up walk-thrus? No one goes to a
workshop solely to do walk-thrus. That's just silly.)

A workshop should teach us how to dance BETTER.

My point was: rather than the workshop teacher springing a new dance on
us--which we won't do that night, and possibly never--it would be just as
easy for them to perfect our footwork, phrasing, handing and formations
using dances to be done _that night_.

If only one workshop leader takes this to heart and saves us from trying to
absorb a dance we don't 'need to know' that day, and helps us correct our
technique using dances from the evening's program, great! I hope that he or
she teaches a workshop I attend.

I reiterate that we are not all locals who've learned by heart the 16-18
dances on the program. And the better we execute them, the better for
everyone.

Margaret Sarna
Fyreladdie

Fyreladdie

Jan. 29, 2006, 10:08 p.m. (Message 43940, in reply to message 43930)

Iain,

<< I appreciate what you are saying, but, as an experienced dancer, I do not 
want to dance the dances from the evening programme if I have enrolled for an 
advanced or advanced technique class.  >>

    I have to agree with you on that. "Dances that never will be done" are 
often presented at workshops by teachers and sometimes become future favorites 
if one brings back the names of devisers and dances to their class. I have been 
exposed to many new dances through workshops that I really enjoy and have 
taught in my own classes later on. I also think there is a distinct reason we go 
to any workshops. Some want more technique, as in newer dancers and those 
trying to improve their dancing level. And there are those who seek more challenge 
of newer dances and the social aspects presented by different teachers.
    As an experienced dancer I have been to workshops where I did not know 
some of the dances on the ball. I sat them out and watched, no shame in that. If 
I were to attend a workshop with a many unknown dances and could not 
participate that would be my own fault. We always have the option of not supporting a 
workshop that is not "user friendly" for our particular needs. Encouragement 
from outside can affect a change too. 
    In the San Francisco Branch we have the Asilomar Workshop that makes 
every effort to accomodate dancers locally and outside the branch. We have ball 
reviews during the day and all the dances for the ball are posted, long in 
advance, often with instructions if it is not an RSCDS book dance. It seems to work 
well and most dancers enjoy the weekend. But the workshop teachers are left 
to choose their dances for the daytime sessions. Some may choose a ball dance. 
But dance workshops are like ice cream. There are many flavors to choose from, 
sometimes not pleasing everyone. It is hard to please everyone, no matter how 
hard we all try. 

Bob McMurtry
San Francisco Branch

Previous Thread Next Thread