April 2, 2006, 5:52 p.m. (Message 44951, in reply to message 44950)
On 4/2/06, Jim Healy <xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx> wrote: > Greetings! > > Who said anything about copyright? Who said anything about legal opinions? > Why is the assumption made that there must be a problem - other than a > slower than desired response. This one is easy. Because your original email said that the publication _depends_ on the outcome of the discussion to them. To my ear, this sounds more like a hostage situation than just a confirmation that they are happy to hear about RSCDS liking their ancestor's notation. And given the copyright confusion related to this issue, we obviously presume that there are difficulties. I am sure that (at least) my opinion could be easily reversed if more concrete information were provided. Regards, Alex.