Jan. 29, 2006, 5:51 p.m. (Message 43934, in reply to message 43932)
It is a bit chicken and egg - when 'traditional dancing' started - way back whenever, it was probably not called 'traditional' dancing, but 'some new-fangled ideas that those young whipper snappers brought in' or words to that effect. Traditional is in itself a development of something - just because we have documented it better than people did hundreds of years ago, and because we can remember the person starting it, doesn't in my opinion mean that it is not a tradition. Tradition in my opinon does not equate with dead and gone and unchanging within a set time-frame, but is a living, developing form of expressive arts with roots in the country/culture/community it started from. Pia