Jan. 29, 2006, 4:47 p.m. (Message 43932, in reply to message 43927)
Your theory breaks down when it comes to the word "tradition" in conjunction with the other words. Country dancing was and is traditional to the U.K. community, but Scottish country dancing never existed before the Society, which made up the term and created something called "scottish country dancing" which is different from the traditional country dances in Scotland. Second problem is that it is a tradition only within the SCD community, which does not qualify as "folk" in the usual sense of the word, since it excludes the other Scottish folk who don´t want to go to classes taught by its teachers, or dance according to their traditions that do not agree with the RSCDS. On the other hand, much of the dancing promoted by the EFDSS does qualify as folk, since their actions have been to record and publish, but not legislate a new non preexisting style. Miss M, and quite rightly so, did not like were folk dancing, as tradition, was headed in Scotland. As a result, she created her own form of dance by selectively sampling and interpreting pre-existing traditional dancing in Scotland. This fits neither the terms "folk" nor "traditional".