April 1, 2006, 2:06 a.m. (Message 44941, in reply to message 44938)
Dick Daniel wrote: > So why is RSCDS crumbling towards oblivion and unable to attract young > people? There is no doubt in my mind. Modern children [and young adults], > of many nationalities, find dancing to good Scottish music, totally > irresistable. These same modern children [and young adults] generally > refuse to submit to the severe regimentational standards imposed by RSCDS. > Standards, which were excellent for the era in which they were introduced > as ground breaking procedures and policies, are now seen as irrelevant, > kill joy and stuffy, by current generations. As the youngsters would > put it --- RSCDS needs to LOOSEN UP. Consider the following: Everybody can have fun kicking a rusty can around the street, and there's nothing intrinsically wrong with having fun that way even if »proper« footballs are round and made from leather. However, playing organised football does take some practice and dedication, but since people are actually trying hard to be accepted by the better teams when they could just as well keep kicking rusty cans around the street, doing it »properly« must obviously be more fun than can-kicking. And incidentally, football DOES have rules, and some rather more complicated ones than SCD at that. Even so, nobody suggests »loosening up« the rules of football to make the game more accessible to the can-kicking public. Dancing (any kind, not just SCD) is just the same. It is absolutely true that one can have lots of fun in SCD as a new dancer, especially if one's teacher does not confuse the dance floor with a military parade ground. But the sort of fun that one derives from, say, doing a sequence of the more intricate figures of The Celtic Brooch with five good dancing friends is something that only comes with a certain amount of practice and dedication, and no amount of »loosening up« will change that. The point is that the fun is already there to be had at all levels of dancing. It is up to the more experienced dancers to make new dancers feel welcome enough so they can grow up to be experienced dancers themselves. The Glasgow school kids affair only goes to prove that SCD can be fun even if the correct pointing of feet is not the first priority, and the fact that Glasgow Branch teachers did the teaching only goes to show that the RSCDS *is* actually »loosening up« already. Apparently the RSCDS were down there in the thick of it rather than outside wrinkling their noses at the outrage, and that is what counts. Sure, not every single one of those 700 school children will go on to become a life-long member of the RSCDS. But the main problem in Scotland seems to be that people tend to *view* the Society as a stuffy assemblage of old fogeys who are intent on taking all the fun out of dancing with their strict rules and standards, obvious evidence to the contrary like the Glasgow schools event notwithstanding. Over here in Germany, where the general public is not thus conditioned, we have no trouble whatsoever attracting *and* keeping young adults in our SCD groups, especially those groups that do attempt to teach RSCDS-style technique and standards. (There are a few children's groups and from what I hear most of those are also going strong.) What the RSCDS needs in Scotland is not »loosening up«. It just needs a PR campaign to educate people. From that point of view the Glasgow event is a Good Thing. Anselm -- Anselm Lingnau, Frankfurt, Germany ..................... xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx Things are only impossible until they're not. -- Cpt. Jean-Luc Picard (ST:TNG)