Jan. 29, 2006, 6:31 p.m. (Message 43936, in reply to message 43931)
Richard Goss wrte: | I agree that what makes it for me with a lot of Scottish country dances i= | s the Scottish traditional music. | =20 | At the same time, one must keep in mind that the sources for most of ou= | r traditional music in Scotland comes from South Britain. If you check th= | e various collections, they were published in London, because the Scots i= | n Scotland could not make any money doing so. Actually, it's a whole lot messier than that. The music may have been published by London print houses, but the music itself could have come from anywhere. The publishers generally weren't too concerted with petty details like this, and were content to attribute the tune to whatever name was on the manuscript. Musical scholars have long lamented this sloppiness. There's an old musical tradition that, if you hear a good tune, you steal it. You adapt it for your own uses, teach it to others, and the next generation thinks it was your tune. A tune gets labelled "Scottish" because they were learned from someone with a Scottish-sounding name (who may well have learned it in Athens or Hong Kong). Or because the editor thought it sounded Scottish. Or because the dance teacher liked the tune, and the dance was labelled "Scottish". Or because Playford labelled it "Scottish". Some publishers have automatically inserted the word "Irish" before the word "jig", and "Scottish" before "reel". And on and on. An example I like to use is that I've played for a fair amount of Morris and Rapper-sword dancing. If you ask the Rapper dancers what are the best tunes for their dance, they'll often say "Irish jigs". This is curious, since the dance form is quite English in origin. But there's a reasonable explanation. What they really want is the busy 6-note sort of jig, played far too fast for "country dancing" due to the fast clogging footwork. I've tried playing some ECD tunes of the sort that should work, and they don't like it. The reason is that they are all ECD dancers, where there's often a strong association between a dance and a specific tune. When I play an ECD tune, they think of the dance - and it's distracting. What they want is that sort of tune, but not a tune that their subconscious associates with any dance. They know that there are lots of good Irish jigs that work. There are also Scottish or Quebecoise jigs that work, and they're happy with those. It's just "English" jigs, i.e. those associated with ECD, that don't work. This is an ideal situation for confusion over tune origins. Imagine a reporter covering an event with a Rapper team or two. The writer learns that this is an English form of sword dancing. The writer also asks the musicians about the music, and gets a list of a few tunes that were played. The tunes are then reported as being "English". It's all very messy, and filled with very sloppy history. In any case, pretending that all these forms of "country dancing" are distinct is not really very good history. It's obvious at a glance that the RSCDS-style dance is a very close relative of the similar English, Irish, French, and New-England dance. It's more interesting to read about the ways they became semi-distinct. Not that it's easy to get reliable information about this.