Jan. 29, 2006, 1:36 a.m. (Message 43918, in reply to message 43917)
Very old issue. Miss M used to stress that SCD was not folk dancing but ballroom dancing. Obviously she had her own difinitions that allowed her to think that these terms as generally understood are not necessarily exclusive. While she would probably never admit to my reasoning, but she was correct in saying that they are not the same as SCD does not meet the normal criteria for folk dancing. She had another reason that I have deduced from conversations with her in addition to her lectures. In her mind, "folk dancing" was peasant dancing, again not necessarily according to most definitions, and Scotland did not have peasants. My suggestion to this is to come up with a good word for all of those highlanders who were cleared into the cities and the colonies. Using the local terms here in Spain, under the general heading of dance we have "ball de bot" (folk dancing), "ball de saló" (ball room dancing), and sevillanas (dancing from Spain, but not the ball de bot that are the regional folk dances). Ballroom dancing does not apply as a criteria here as all dancing of all three types is done outside, though the only dancing I have not seen inside is folk dancing (ball de bot). Under the classification of ball de bot, there are 4 types, all of which share music and steps, but not necessarily style with Spain. These are the jota and bolero, which are considered peasant dances, and fandangos, which are in the style of the "senyoria", the last, the mateixa, is freestyle couple dancing, without ever having a formation, but using both steps from the other three, but also shading off into the type of dancing done at rock concerts. Even if we pretend that SCD was ever folk dancing, once the Society got a hold of it, it would cease to be since the very nature of a controling organization tends to put a stop to the traditional folk process.