Jan. 27, 2005, 3:13 a.m. (Message 40423)
Wilson 1815 agrees with Rosemary as to the track; no barring is given. The description and illustration can be found on p. 42. I copied the URL for this specific page into this post; but, when I tested it, it didn't work. You can use this link to get the full list of manuals; scroll to the end to find the Wilson books. http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/dihtml/dicatlg.html (I just tested this and it does work) As Rosemary said, by the last decade of the 18th c., the figure used 8 bars. This agrees with the Early American (late 18th c.) collections that I have, describing the figure as Rosemary indicated, and using 8 bars of music. Sometime in there folks started doing 4-bar Rights and Lefts which, to my tastes, is rather inelegant and, quite frankly, pointless. (gratuitous editorial comment) One wonders why they wanted to dance so quickly with these 4-bar figures..... Pat
Jan. 27, 2005, 9:12 a.m. (Message 40425, in reply to message 40423)
Just a thought, but is it possible that their concept of "bar" and ours is different by a magnitude of 2. I have a lot of dance music that would look like a strathspey today but if one divides all of the bars in half the music could become one of our reels, jigs, hornpipes, depending on the editing.
Jan. 27, 2005, 4:30 p.m. (Message 40430, in reply to message 40425)
| Just a thought, but is it possible that their concept of "bar" and ours is different by a magnitude of 2. I have a lot of dance music that would look like a strathspey today but if one divides all of the bars in half the music could become one of our reels, jigs, hornpipes, depending on the editing. Quite possible. A lot of tunes work in several rhythms and tempos. Some tune writers, including J.S. Skinner, have published tunes in more than one rhythm. For example, his reel Angus Campbell is the same tune as the Laird of Drumblair, a strathspey. He also published the trad tune Wap an' Rowe (aka Reel of Stumpie) as both a reel and a strathspey. In this case, the barring and tempo are the same, but the rhythm is different. (And the "reel" form is more like a polka.) The other musicians here can probably give a lot more examples.
Jan. 28, 2005, 5:49 a.m. (Message 40443, in reply to message 40425)
G'Day, This certainly seems possible. I have a CD of Julian Bream playing dances by John Dowland (1563-1626) and the programme notes describe the Galliard as being "a quick dance to slow music". This could have carried forward into the next century. It is certainly possible to dance in reel time to Strathspey music, as happens when the teacher (woops) plays the wrong track! Incidentally, a "gigge" (jig) was described in 1676 as "only fit for Fantastical and Easy-Light-Headed People". Brian Charlton, Sydney, Australia
Jan. 27, 2005, 11:55 a.m. (Message 40426, in reply to message 40423)
Pat wrote: > Sometime in there folks started doing 4-bar Rights and Lefts which, to my > tastes, is rather inelegant and, quite frankly, pointless. (gratuitous > editorial comment) One wonders why they wanted to dance so quickly with > these 4-bar figures..... Following on from Richard's last comment, do you think that they might have been dancing two steps to the bar, in the same way that we did when Maxwell's Rant was first published? Malcolm Malcolm L Brown York
Jan. 27, 2005, 9:22 p.m. (Message 40432, in reply to message 40426)
Just remembered that this can go both ways. The RSCDS, as opposed to Playford and the EFDSS version, of "Red House" takes a 16 bar figure, set 4 bars cast 4, repeat to place, and cuts it into an 8 bar (set, cast, set, cast back).
Jan. 27, 2005, 9:53 p.m. (Message 40433, in reply to message 40426)
Malcolm wrote, > Following on from Richard's last comment, do you think that they might have been > dancing two steps to the bar, in the same way that we did when Maxwell's Rant was > first published? One can't really think in terms of two steps to the bar, as it's thought that dancers used walking or running steps then. (It's interesting that David Young's 1740 MS instructs them to "run" a reel of three.) However, it's also thought that musical tempos were much slower than they are now, though apparently they were faster by Wilson's time (Pat will confirm this). Dance tunes included time signatures like 12/8, 9/8, and 9/4--the variety of the tunes must have made up for the lack of complexity in the steps! I'd hate to be a musician playing a 12/8 tune at nearly 1 bar per second, our current reel/jig tempo. To complicate things further, for a while in the middle of the 18th century, dances set to 6/8 and 2/4 music used twice the number of bars for a given figure in comparison to dances set to other tempos. So for the figure we're discussing, "cross over two couples," 8 bars would be used in those tempos. Rosemary Coupe