Feb. 27, 2018, 10:53 a.m. (Message 69483, in reply to message 69481)
Anselm asked for an example of ambiguity. Admittedly, in this case there is no ambiguity in the instructions, but many, many years ago now the habit had crept in for the final all-round poussette in 'Bonnie Anne' for the 1s & 2s and 3s & 4s to be done as ordinary progressive poussettes. There were three couples in the set who knew nothing other than the 'bad' habit. The remaining couple were very serious dancers, who incidentally almost invariably danced together, who must have known the correct version. All was well until the final eight bars. Anselm's "guess is that the vast majority of such “mismatches” will be sorted out dynamically” and at worst lead to a good laugh." was way off the mark in this case, certainly for the 'serious' couple. The light-hearted attitude to chaos of the other three was disapproved of so vigorously that the atmosphere became really poisonous. It sticks in my memory solely because it cast such a shadow over the rest of the evening. Incidentally, I was checking my spelling of 'poussette' in my 2006 edition of the Society's "Index to Formations and Movements ...", and 'Bonnie Anne' does not get a mention. A quick random selection of titles I have danced socially seems to indicate that MacNab dances might be beyond the pale as far as this 'Index' is concerned? Andrew, Bristol, UK