March 8, 2006, 6:46 p.m. (Message 44580)
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 12:35:28 -0500 "Alexandre Rafalovitch" <xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx> wrote: > P.s. TLA (three-letter-acronym) was at one point a self referential > joke, the same way Linux operating system could be interpreted as > Linux Is Not UniX..... > You COULD interpret it that way but I don't believe that was the intent. I understand Linux was named that because it was LINus Torvald's interpretation of the UniX kernel. On the other hand, Richard Stallman's original system GNU, which Linux works with, IS self-referential, and I suspect what you were thinking of: GNU stands for GNU's Not Unix! -Steve -- Steve Wyrick - Concord, California
March 8, 2006, 7:03 p.m. (Message 44583, in reply to message 44580)
>> GNU stands for GNU's Not Unix Steve, what does the G stand for? Jan
March 8, 2006, 7:04 p.m. (Message 44584, in reply to message 44580)
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 18:03:13 +0000 Jan E Rudge <xxxxxx@xxx.xxx> wrote: >>> GNU stands for GNU's Not Unix > > Steve, what does the G stand for? GNU! -- Steve Wyrick - Concord, California
March 8, 2006, 8:48 p.m. (Message 44588, in reply to message 44584)
LIke in Wildebeast - and Onyx? Pia
March 9, 2006, 3:36 p.m. (Message 44611, in reply to message 44588)
Pia wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 18:03:13 +0000 > Jan E Rudge <xxxxxx@xxx.xxx> wrote: > >>>> GNU stands for GNU's Not Unix >> >> Steve, what does the G stand for? > > GNU! > > LIke in Wildebeast - and Onyx? No, Like in GNU's Not Unix! It's recursive, remember? ;-) -- Steve Wyrick -- Concord, California
March 9, 2006, 4:42 p.m. (Message 44612, in reply to message 44611)
:>) Now why did you not jus say so :>) :>) PIa Who hasn't got a clue