Sept. 29, 2001, 2:05 p.m. (Message 27593)
Simon, Re, > I hope we meet again. > > Cheers Simon There's a good chance we will - Patty & I are kind of "SCD road warriors," always on the lookout for a good workshop weekend to go to ("have ghillies, will travel"). We haven't really made it all the way to your home territory yet, but it's only a matter of time. Happy dancing, Lee
Sept. 29, 2001, 3:33 p.m. (Message 27595, in reply to message 27593)
Ah, Patty & Lee!!! Fellow Travelers?
Sept. 30, 2001, 1:26 a.m. (Message 27598, in reply to message 27595)
Hi, Marilyn, It seems I've added yet another entry to the "oops, wrong cc address" club. I think we need a new word to identify a list post that was supposed to be a private e-mail. I suggest "oops-mail." Then, we can form a group called Oops-Mailaholics Anonymous (OMA), and start a twelve-step program to cure the affliction. But yes, fellow travelers to wherever there's good music, good dancing, and good company. Lee (Who's feet, after dancing four half-hour demos of six dances each this afternoon, are very very sore...) Send reply to: xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx From: Marilynn Knight <xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx> To: "'xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx'" <xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx> Subject: RE: Buffalo Workshop Date sent: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 09:33:42 -0400
Sept. 30, 2001, 8:13 a.m. (Message 27602, in reply to message 27593)
Hi Lee, For some reason I have received the message you sent to Simon Scott??!! I thought I should get back to you rather than sending it directly to Simon. When you do contact him please give him my regards (also Royce's). Happy dancing, Jan Wilson Alexandria, Sydney Australia
Sept. 30, 2001, 3:06 p.m. (Message 27604, in reply to message 27593)
Lee, Perhaps your sore 'demo feet' are a new interpretation of that saying, 'what price beauty'? Maybe a dance named 'Oops Again'? Best, Marilynn
Oct. 1, 2001, 4:25 a.m. (Message 27608, in reply to message 27593)
In a message dated 09/29/2001 9:34:16 AM Eastern Daylight Time, xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx writes: > Ah, Patty & Lee!!! Fellow Travelers? > Here, in New York, the term for people like you (and me) who are inclined to follow the workshops around is "trekkies". Interesting how language seems to vary from one area to another, let alone from one country to another. Chris.
Oct. 1, 2001, 11:06 p.m. (Message 27624, in reply to message 27608)
> > Ah, Patty & Lee!!! Fellow Travelers? > > > Here, in New York, the term for people like you (and me) who are inclined to > follow the workshops around is "trekkies". Interesting how language seems to > vary from one area to another, let alone from one country to another. > > Chris Ronald Hi, Chris Fine surname you have - :) On this side of the pond 'trekkies' is the name for the avid followers of Star Trek. As you say, interesting variations. Cheers, Ron :) < 0 Ron Mackey,(Purveyor of Pat's Party Pieces) 'O> Mottingham, /#\ London. UK. l> xxx.xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx
Oct. 3, 2001, 5:39 a.m. (Message 27687, in reply to message 27593)
Sorry everybody! However I have just replied to yet another e-mail from Donald Lee Fuell Jnr so if that does get on to Strathspey please accept my apologies. As far as I am aware I have returned the messages directly to the sender. Jan Wilson Alexandria, Sydney Australia
Oct. 3, 2001, 1:28 p.m. (Message 27690, in reply to message 27593)
Jan, You're not alone. I've been getting these messages as well. Must be a glitch in one system or the other. Nadene B. Hunter Dansville, NY
Oct. 4, 2001, 4:08 a.m. (Message 27724, in reply to message 27593)
Copied from email address of email on the list. From: xxxxxxxxx@xxx.xxx Reply-to: xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx To: xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx >> The confusion as to who gets a message may be in the FROM versus the REPLY TO Even though a message is from "personal xxxx@xxx.xxx' The REPLY TO address is the strathspey list. One needs to be careful.... I think we have all, accidentally posted to the list when meaning it to be personal. I know I have. Elaine,