Oct. 4, 2001, 6:23 p.m. (Message 27746)
>Richard Goss wrote: > > >...At the time of publication, "Machine..." had no living tradition as >being danced, so the Society had to rely on Rutherford, >1772 for its >source of information. My reading of R1772 indicates that this may well >have happened in this case. Richard: Now that we know you are alive & posting, please tell me what page and in which volume of Rutherford I might find Machine? I have both volumes from a (perfectly legal) copy made at the Vaughn Williams Library at Cecil Sharp House. Thanks, Ken McFarland