June 22, 2006, 1:19 a.m. (Message 45631, in reply to message 45606)
There is also inby and outby In message <xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>, Anselm Lingnau <xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx> writes >John Chambers wrote: > >> We do have a minor problem in English, in that the opposite >> of "within" obviously should be "without", [...] > >You mean as in > > Come all without, come all within, > You'll not see nothing like the Mighty Quinn! > >Then again, the opposite of ›outwith‹ should obviously be ›inwith‹!? > >Anselm -- Bryan McAlister