May 31, 2006, 3:29 a.m. (Message 45431, in reply to message 45425)
John, a minor correction: I'm pretty sure you meant _8_ 8th-notes and 2 beats per bar (which works out to cut time). Incidentally, this business of confusing common (4/4) and cut time signatures isn't a new issue. Looking at facimiles of Robert Petrie's and William Marshall's tunebooks from around the turn of the 18th/19th century, reels in both collections are notated in either cut or common time, with no apparent reason for the choice of one or the other! -Steve John Chambers wrote: > Reels are conventionally written, with 4 8th-notes and two beats per > bar. So the correct time signature is 2/2, or the C-with-a-bar (M:C| > in ABC), which is a synonym for 2/2. It would be better to write them > with 8 16th-notes per bar, and 2/4 as the time signature. Sometimes > you see that, but not often. To understand why, you have to study the > history of musical notation. The reason isn't logic; it's history. -- Steve Wyrick -- Concord, California