May 26, 2006, 2:14 p.m. (Message 45389, in reply to message 45388)
On 26/05/2006 14:05, Anselm Lingnau wrote: > Alan Paterson wrote: > > >>Is there a scientific method of identifying a Hornpipe? > > > No. There is a widespread misconception that hornpipe phrases always end with > a pom-pom-pom but it turns out that there are lots of hornpipes that don't as > well als non-hornpipes that do. > >>From an RSCDS-style dancer's point of view the difference between reels and > hornpipes is about as important as the number of angels that can dance on the > point of a pin, as the steps and tempo are 100% identical. Which is why DanceData doesn't have dance-type Hornpipe (despite complaints in that department). > For an RSCDS-style > musician, the matter becomes somewhat more important, as when making up sets > of tunes you usually want to combine hornpipes with other hornpipes, but one > can usually go by the titles or by gut feeling (I know I do). Test for gut feeling: If anyone has the album Best Foot Forward by Sound Company (just on cassette I fear) tell me if you think the first track feels like a hornpipe. > Then again, there's the dance, Kendall's Hornpipe, which is a jig. Pretty much a conversation stopper that one <grin> Alan