strathspey@strathspey.org:44783

Fran Smith

RE: Two chords - a question

March 20, 2006, 9:15 p.m. (Message 44783, in reply to message 44751)

The very point that occurred to me...
Fran Smith  (herefordshire)
	


> From:: "simon scott" <xxxxx.xxxxx@xxxxx.xxx>
> To: "'SCD news and discussion'" <xxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> Subject: RE: Two chords - a question
> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:39:32 -0800

> Yes, this was discussed at some length not too long ago, but since I
> already 
> see a mini-consensus buildling on this go-round, I'll add my vote to it
> with 
> an analogy which perhaps makes sense.  When it is time to form sets for
> a 
> square-formation dance, we don't form a (more common) longwise set, and
> then move 
> into a square on a second chord.  So why not always form the set
> according to 
> the needs for the outset of the actual dancing?  A number of factors go
> into 
> the formation of the set...is it longwise or square, perhaps even a
> triangle, 
> and how many couples per set?...so why not who's on which side as well?
> 
> Robb Quint
> Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
> 
> 
> I agree ONE HUNDRED percent !
> 
> Simon
> Vancouver

Lycos email has 300 Megabytes of free storage... Get it now at mail.lycos.co.uk