strathspey@strathspey.org:44206

Volleyballjerry

Re: PINEWOODS 2006

Feb. 9, 2006, 5:17 p.m. (Message 44206, in reply to message 44205)

Seeing the "Re:" on the subject heading below, I assumed that it was a reply 
to a previous message, and since I know folks who might be interested in 
Pinewoods, I went hunting for the original message to forward to them as well.  Not 
having found it among recent messages, I sorted alphabetically by subject 
heading and still found none.  I assume then that likely Jane included the "Re:" 
as part of her original subject heading to mean "this is concerning."  Based 
on my wild-goose chase for an original message, I would suggest that folks not 
do that, but simply allow the e-mail to automatically add the "Re" ONLY when 
responding to an already posted message.

(Apologies of course in advance to Jane if there actually had been an 
original message that I somehow had not been able to locate.)

Robb Quint
Thousand Oaks, CA, USA

In a message dated 02/09/2006 5:32:38 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
xxxxxxxxx@xxx.xxx writes: