Sept. 17, 2001, 8:50 a.m. (Message 27393, in reply to message 27390)
We in Bristol, UK, organise a dance under the caption "Newcomers' Dance" once a year in the early spring. This gives people who have just started dancing in the autumn a chance to experience a fairly simple evening, and as every dance is talked/walked through we do get children, young people, and a few normally non-dancing partners along, and in fact, and there is a lesson here if only we would learn it, it is our best attended dance. We have also, this year for the first time, introduced a reduced rate for tickets for young persons and students. I am convinced that there is a strong element in SCD that is guilty of intellectual snobbery as far as dance simplicity vs. complexity is concerned and it will lead to the demise of SCD as a popular activity if we are not careful. We are in danger of losing the simple social pleasure, and IMHO we will fail to attract new and (more essentially) younger dancers if we are do not more consistently supply a simple but lively programme. For me a "good" dancer is not one who can execute a very large number of complicated figures to perfection, but one who can move easily to the music, with neat footwork and above all an enjoyment in so doing which is communicated to the others dancing in the set through example, body language etc and by helping and encouraging those less advanced in these skills. I know one or two technically very accomplished dancers whom I have seen sailing on through chaos, executing the dance irrespective of the fact that the rest of the set has virtually lost the plot. This is far from encouraging. Andrew.