I dance without having to refer to the hierarchy and have done most of my
life, but it has been great occasionally to go to the Manual and find out
how to and why when I'm teaching. In my opinion the Manual does not tell
you what is right or wrong, but gives a solution to some conundrums.
Eventually I'm sure more formations will be included - as in all written
material the manual is out of date the minute it was published. The gypsy
turn turns up more and more now, but a few years ago it was a rare sight
(and I would dearly love for someone to determine what is a correct gypsy
turn as it covers a multitute of sins) - and I love them all.
For example, I would use 'gypsy turn' to explain a half turn and twist
without holding hands. But do you use skip change of step to travel towards
and past your partner, and then change to pas de basque for the turn or do
you continue with skip change of step. It is little snippets like that
which makes the Manual invaluable.
OH and it brings a whole new concept to SCD - you gaze deeply into your
partners eyes - Aaarrrgghhhhh - how will we survive :>)
What has the Pope got to do with SCD? - we all know that Miss Milligan was
she who had to be obeyed.
From: Martin Sheffield [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: 14 December 2008 16:29
Subject: Re: What is a 'gypsy turn'?
2008/12/14 Campbell Tyler wrote: > > if it were an official RSCDS term then I doubt the > question would even have arisen. The person asking it would have gone to > the manual (...) It might also have resulted in many emails about how it
used > to be danced differently until someone unilaterally changed it without > reference to the masses, etc etc.
Which is why the Manual is irrelevant for a vast number of dancers,
who are tired of being told what is "right " or "wrong" by a
A lot of people enjoy their dancing without need to refer to the
hierarchy, just as many people get on with their lives without
referring to the pope.