On Thu, 21 Oct 1999 Alan Paterson posted: > ... As we all know, at a ball or social dance, ... an encore may > be requested. ........ However, what do you do when it is a > 2-couple dance?... 2 alternatives .... > > - The top 2 couples dance only. When the 1st time through is over, > the 1st couple drop to 4th place.... Disadvantage: 2-couples are > hanging about at the bottom every time through.
Agreed: a very frustrating way of using the encore time.
> - the 3s and 4s start dancing immediately. Progression as in the normal 8 > times through situation: Disadvantage: it is a bit unfair. 1st couple > dance 3 times from 1st place. 2nd couple dances once from 2nd place and > twice from 1st place, 3rd couple dances omce from 1st place and twice from > 2nd place, 4th couple dances 3 times from 2nd place. > > Does anyone have any other variant? Is there a generally accepted standard > anywhere? > > I believe that I have worked out a 'fair' variant in that everyone dances > all the time but the people in 2nd and 3rd place change places after > every repetition, but that might just be a mite tricky :-}
We had an encore of a 2-couple dance in Rechberg. In our set 1C
several times scampered down to 4pl ("Once and to the bottom"),
and then the bottom 2 couples danced with a "late start". Quite fair,
but much less satisfactory than your suggestion of the 2pl-3pl switch.
It is a pity the MC (was it you or Jack Campbell?) did not propose
the 2pl-3pl switch. No more "tricky" than "once and to the bottom"
which everyone can manage. I expect this idea would catch on
rapidly and soon become standard, at least in Germany.
I much prefer your variant to the alternative of splitting into 2C sets.
That is also fair, but much less social.
Eric T. Ferguson, van Dormaalstraat 15, 5624 KH EINDHOVEN, Netherlands
tel: +31-40-243 2878 fax: +31-40-246 7036 e-mail: email@example.com