Another perspective on extra twiddles

Anselm Lingnau

Message 17789 · 28 Jun 1999 19:27:31 · Variable-width font · Whole thread

Previous message: Another perspective on extra twiddles (RuddBaron)
Next message: Another perspective on extra twiddles (Miriam L. Mueller)
Previous in thread: Another perspective on extra twiddles (RuddBaron)
Next in thread: Another perspective on extra twiddles (RuddBaron)

XxxxXxxxx@xxx.xxx writes:

> I see no reason why a compotent dancer
> should be thrown off because another dancer adds a twirl/twiddle in the
> middle of a reel.

IMHO there is nothing wrong with embellishments (within reason). The
difficulties arise when people who can't do the plain vanilla version of
a figure, for example, `Dance to each corner and set', feel compelled
(for whatever reason) to try out the embellished version.

I was at the same ball as Alan and Andrew last Saturday, and while I
agree with Andrew that considerable fun was had by most of the dancers
(beginners and experienced dancers alike), I must say that Alan has a
point about the embellishments. I was in the fortunate position of not
having any dances spoiled by overembellishing (other than the fair share
of mist^H^H^H^Hunintentional embellishments that we are all permitted)
but I have heard from others in the hall that various people really went
over the top at times, with mixed results. (I doubt that this is a local
phenomenon.)

Anselm
--
Anselm Lingnau ......................... xxxxxxx@xx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx-xxxxxxxxx.xx
We are lucky we don't have as much government as we pay for! -- Will Rodgers

Previous message: Another perspective on extra twiddles (RuddBaron)
Next message: Another perspective on extra twiddles (Miriam L. Mueller)
Previous in thread: Another perspective on extra twiddles (RuddBaron)
Next in thread: Another perspective on extra twiddles (RuddBaron)
A Django site.